By Emma Henry

Last Updated: 2:19am BST 02/04/2008

Heather Mills wants secret documents exposing Sir Paul McCartney’s alleged behaviour during their marriage published and may return to court to make it happen, her lawyer has said.
In an interview with the Evening Standard, David Rosen said Miss Mills wants to put the record straight over claims that she is a gold-digger who was only interested in the former Beatle’s £400 million fortune.

He said his client is also frustrated that the full judgment of the couple’s divorce case - in which the judge accused her of “make belief”, inconsistency and inaccuracy - was published while the full court transcripts were held back.

Mr Justice Bennett said she was a “less than impressive witness” during the six-day hearing last month who “wholly exaggerated” the extent of her wealth before she met her now ex-husband.

Miss Mills is now considering launching a new legal battle to have all the details made public, which she believes will allow people to make up their own minds, Mr Rosen said.

Last weeks, friends of the former model said she had hired a new team of forensic accountants to try to prove that her ex-husband Paul McCartney is worth double the £400 million he claimed in their divorce struggle.

According to leaked press reports during the lengthy divorce battle, Miss Mills had accused Sir Paul of being violent towards her, but Mr Justice Bennett said he did not take this allegation into account when he released his judgment, which awarded her £24.3 million.

At the time the allegations were made, Sir Paul said he would be “defending these allegations vigorously and appropriately” in the divorce hearing.

Mr Rosen said: “The conduct was not relevant and didn’t factor in the judgment. But that doesn’t mean to say it is not relevant at all to her and what people may think of her.

“She just wants the public to have the full facts of the case. She wants people to know that she was a good mother and a good wife.”

In the interview, Mr Rosen also claimed that Miss Mills was prepared to take only £20m, but that Sir Paul refused to settle out-of-court.

He also claimed his client had offered to sign a pre-nuptial agreement, but Sir Paul had not been keen, and that she was now living in fear of “wackos”.